Submit a preprint

320

Negative impact of mild arid conditions on a rodent revealed using a physiological approach in naturause asterix (*) to get italics
Hamilcar S. Keilani, Nico L. Avenant, Pierre Caminade, Neville Pillay, Guila GanemPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2024
<p>1. Understanding how organisms respond to seasonal variations in their environment can be a window to their potential adaptability, a classical problem in evolutionary ecology. In the context of climate change, inducing increased aridity and disruption of seasonality, it is crucial to study the extent and limits of species responsiveness.<br>2. Here, the physiological response to food and water shortage during seasonally dry conditions were investigated. We studied populations of two rodent species of the genus Rhabdomys, one arid and one mesic, in a semi-arid zone where their range overlap in South Africa. We measured blood concentrations of markers of kidney and liver function, as well as body condition, at the onset and the end of the dry season.<br>3. We found similar shifts in blood metabolite levels, in the semi-arid populations of the two species, indicating malnutrition consistent with the observed degradation of habitat quality between the start and the end of the dry season. Furthermore, regardless of the period, differences between the two species in blood metabolite concentrations (e.g. amylase, sodium, alkaline phosphatase) were observed, suggesting contrasting diets and water conservation abilities.<br>4. Overall, we show that, as seasonal dry conditions worsen, organisms are increasingly affected by reduced food availability, and local adaptation to arid conditions may provide the arid species with an advantage to cope with semi-arid conditions. Our study suggests that even mild arid conditions could have a negative impact and questions resilience of animals to harsher arid conditions.</p>
http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25408522You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25408522You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Aridity, blood metabolites, ecophysiology, liver, local adaptation, nutrition, Rhabdomys
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Ecology, Evolution, Physiology
Samuel Caro samuel.caro@cefe.cnrs.fr, Brian K McNab bkm@ufl.edu, Rochelle Buffenstein rbuffen@uic.edu, Pablo Burraco burraco@ebd.csic.es, Garth Herring gherring@usgs.gov, Peeter Hõrak horak@ut.ee, Pauline Vuarin suggested: Benjamin Rey : benjamin.rey@univ-lyon1.fr, Sylvain Giroud suggested: Prof Melanie Dammhahn - mdammhah@uni-muenster.de, Sylvain Giroud suggested: Prof Joanna Fietz - Joanna.Fietz@uni-hohenheim.de, Sylvain Giroud suggested: Dr Rebecca Rimbach - rrimbach@uni-muenster.de
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Zool. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2024-05-02 18:38:29
Vincent Foray